1999 · 117 citations · 11 references
Language StudiesEnglishLinguisticsDiscourse AnalysisEnglish WritingNatural Language ProcessingAutomated Essay ScoringLanguage AssessmentLanguage Proficiency TestingSecond Language AcquisitionWriting AssessmentWriting ProficiencyAutomated Writing EvaluationEnglish As A Second Language WritingEssay Quality AssessmentHuman Agreement ModelingLearner Writing AnalysisSyntactic Features
The e‑rater system™ is an operational automated essay scoring system developed at ETS, and the writing community is keen to assess its performance on nonnative speaker essays. This study examines e‑rater’s performance on Test of Written English essays written by nonnative speakers whose native languages are Chinese, Arabic, or Spanish. The data include a small sample of US‑born English speakers and a sample of non‑US‑born candidates who report English as their native language. Across Chinese, Arabic, Spanish, and English speakers, e‑rater achieved ~92% agreement with human raters, with significant score differences between native and nonnative groups but overall high agreement, and its core discourse, topical, and syntactic features generalize well across linguistic variation.
The e-rater system™ is an operational automated essay scoring system, developed at Educational Testing Service (ETS). The average agreement between human readers, and between independent human readers and e-rater is approximately 92%. There is much interest in the larger writing community in examining the system's performance on nonnative speaker essays. This paper focuses on results of a study that show e-rater's performance on Test of Written English (TWE) essay responses written by nonnative English speakers whose native language is Chinese, Arabic, or Spanish. In addition, one small sample of the data is from US-born English speakers, and another is from non-US-born candidates who report that their native language is English. As expected, significant differences were found among the scores of the English groups and the nonnative speakers. While there were also differences between e-rater and the human readers for the various language groups, the average agreement rate was as high as operational agreement. At least four of the five features that are included in e-rater's current operational models (including discourse, topical, and syntactic features) also appear in the TWE models. This suggests that the features generalize well over a wide range of linguistic variation, as e-rater was not confounded by non-standard English syntactic structures or stylistic discourse structures which one might expect to be a problem for a system designed to evaluate native speaker writing.
11
Automatic essay grading using text categorization techniques
Leah S. Larkey · 1998 · 281 citations · Full text
Using register-diversified corpora for general language studies
Douglas Biber · 1993 · 238 citations
Automated scoring using a hybrid feature identification technique
Jill Burstein, Karen Kukich, Susanne Wolff et al. · 1998 · 153 citations · Full text