The Review of Economics and Statistics · 1996 · 55 citations · 7 references
Social SciencesEconomicsLabor EconomicsLabor Market AnalysisMicroeconomicsBehavioral Labor EconomicsDemand TheoryIncome DistributionLoss AversionTime PreferencesUtility TheoryEquilibriumIndifference CurvesIndifference RelationLabor Market SupplyLabor Supply ModelingLoss Aversion In MarketsOvertime Premium RatesReference Point Dependence
The study develops empirically derived indifference functions for income and leisure that capture loss aversion and adaptation. The authors collected data from original surveys of seven diverse labor markets. The indifference functions consistently show loss aversion and adaptation, explaining labor market stability and yielding labor supply curves with markedly smaller discontinuities than simulated curves lacking these features. © 1996 MIT Press.
This paper presents empirically determined indifference functions for income and leisure which exhibit the phenomena of loss aversion and a utility reference point determined by adaptation, as expounded by Kahneman and Tversky and others. Data for this study were gathered in original surveys of seven diverse labor markets. The indifference functions of all show common features consistent with loss aversion/adaptation. These features help explain stability in labor markets in the face of an overtime premium which prevents the many workers in the United States from being at an optimal equilibrium and causes discontinuities in labor supply curves. Labor supply curves derived from indifference curves with the loss aversion adaptation features have much smaller discontinuities than those based on simulated curves without these features. Copyright 1996 by MIT Press.
7
Status quo bias in decision making
William Samuelson, Richard Zeckhauser · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · 1988 · 5.9K citations
Toward a positive theory of consumer choice
Richard H. Thaler · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · 1980 · 5.6K citations
Allen Parducci, Harry Helson · The American Journal of Psychology · 1965 · 2.5K citations