Journal of Applied Psychology · 1992 · 113 citations · 63 references
Social SciencesPsychologyMethod ValidationPsychometricsScale DevelopmentDimensionality AssessmentFactor AnalysisLatent Trait ModelingPsychological TestingStructural Equation ModelingTrait StructureCross-group Latent Construct ComparisonsHierarchical Factor ModelsMeasurement Model IdentificationMulti-group Measurement ModelsMultidimensional Latent Trait ModelsPerformance Dimension AnalysisSecond-order Factor AnalysisSecond-order Factor Models
We used hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis to test alternative latent structures underlying performance in multiple dimensions as measured by work samples and three rating sources. The model receiving strongest support was one that specified multidimensional trait (performance dimension) and measurement method second-order factors (SOFs). This model exhibited significant convergent and discrimant validity, showed significant measurement method effects, and indicated that different measurement methods assess somewhat different aspects of the total criterion construct space. Significant correlations between measurement method SOFs and performance predictors suggest the need to reconsider the interpretation of method factors, not as bias, but as possibly representing different overall perspectives on performance
63
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Lee J. Cronbach, Paul E. Meehl · Psychological Bulletin · 1955 · 10.9K citations · Full text
Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models.
Stanley A. Mulaik, Larry R. James, Judith Van Alstine et al. · Psychological Bulletin · 1989 · 2.9K citations