Hands-On Undergraduate Geotechnical Engineering Modules in the Context of Effective Learning Pedagogies, ABET Outcomes, and Our Curricular Reform

Abstract

Hands-on inquiry-based educational modules were designed for two undergraduate geotechnical engineering courses at the University of Vermont. The modules were designed to achieve three objectives: (1) meet the goals of our ongoing civil and environmental engineering curricular reform (e.g., inquiry-based experiential learning and civic engagement through service-learning); (2) reach higher levels of Bloom’s taxonomy in specific topical areas addressed by the modules; and (3) help achieve Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) outcomes for civil and environmental engineering programs. All four modules were conducted within team settings and required students to write formal technical papers or reports followed by presentations. An additional underlying objective was the development of students’ interpersonal and communication skills. The educational modules included: (1) Atterberg limits using Casagrande and fall cone devices; (2) physical, analytical, and numerical modelings of steady-state seepage; (3) validation of undrained slope stability, bearing capacity of shallow foundations, and active and passive lateral earth pressure analytical solutions using centrifuge modeling; and (4) service-learning projects related to foundations, retaining structures, or slope stability for rehabilitation of historic structures. Student reflection and self-assessment activities were conducted. The student self-assessment results and assessments of student work indicated that many of the curricular reform objectives, ABET outcomes, and higher levels of Bloom’s taxonomy could be reached through these modules. Modules similar to these could be effective in other engineering disciplines and subdisciplines.