Environmental Research Letters · 2014 · 189 citations · 48 references
AgricultureNutritionNutritional SciencesFood SecurityGlobal NutritionHuman NutritionDietary GuidelinesWater AccessWater Footprint AssessmentWater ManagementBlue Water FootprintEnergy Intake ReductionFood System Environmental Footprint AssessmentGreen Water FootprintNutrient Intake ReductionWater Consumption PatternsWater Consumption ReductionWater Footprint Measurement
Water and land resources are increasingly pressured worldwide, and diet change has been proposed to support food security for a growing population. The study evaluates how diet change affects the blue and green water footprints of food consumption. The authors compare current diets with guideline‑adherent diets and then evaluate four scenarios that progressively reduce animal protein to 50 %, 25 %, 12.5 %, and 0 % of total protein intake. Reducing animal products can lower global green water use by up to 21 % and blue water by up to 14 %, potentially freeing enough water to feed 1.8 billion more people, though the benefits vary by region and require local tailoring.
Water and land resources are under increasing pressure in many parts of the globe. Diet change has been suggested as a measure to contribute to adequate food security for the growing population. This paper assesses the impact of diet change on the blue and green water footprints of food consumption. We first compare the water consumption of the current diets with that of a scenario where dietary guidelines are followed. Then, we assess these footprints by applying four scenarios in which we gradually limit the amount of protein from animal products to 50%, 25%, 12.5% and finally 0% of the total protein intake. We find that the current water use at the global scale would be sufficient to secure a recommended diet and worldwide energy intake. Reducing the animal product contribution in the diet would decrease global green water consumption by 6%, 11%, 15% and 21% within the four applied scenarios, while for blue water, the reductions would be 4%, 6%, 9% and 14%. In Latin America, Europe, Central and Eastern Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, diet change mainly reduces green water use, while in the Middle East region, North America, Australia and Oceania, both blue and green water footprints decrease considerably. At the same time, in South and Southeast Asia, diet change does not result in decreased water use. Our results show that reducing animal products in the human diet offers the potential to save water resources, up to the amount currently required to feed 1.8 billion additional people globally; however, our results show that the adjustments should be considered on a local level.
48
A safe operating space for humanity
Johan Rockström, Will Steffen, Kevin J. Noone et al. · Nature · 2009 · 12.9K citations
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Jonathan A. Foley, Navin Ramankutty, Kate A. Brauman et al. · Nature · 2011 · 8.3K citations · Full text
Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases
Who Joint · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 2002 · 4.9K citations
Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change
David Tilman, Joseph Fargione, Brian A. Wolff et al. · Science · 2001 · 4K citations
The State of Food Insecurity in the World
WFP WFP · 2015 · 3K citations