Concepedia

TLDR

Many essential learning tasks are perceived as boring and tedious by learners. The study proposes that fostering a self‑transcendent, prosocial purpose enhances academic self‑regulation on boring tasks. The authors employed brief interventions and short‑term experiments to test causal effects and mechanisms of self‑transcendent purpose on academic self‑regulation. Across four studies with over 2,000 participants, a self‑transcendent purpose for learning correlated with better self‑regulation, longer persistence on boring tasks, lower dropout rates, higher GPA, deeper learning, and sustained self‑regulation, whereas self‑oriented motives did not consistently produce these benefits.

Abstract

Many important learning tasks feel uninteresting and tedious to learners. This research proposed that promoting a prosocial, self-transcendent purpose could improve academic self-regulation on such tasks. This proposal was supported in 4 studies with over 2,000 adolescents and young adults. Study 1 documented a correlation between a self-transcendent purpose for learning and self-reported trait measures of academic self-regulation. Those with more of a purpose for learning also persisted longer on a boring task rather than giving in to a tempting alternative and, many months later, were less likely to drop out of college. Study 2 addressed causality. It showed that a brief, one-time psychological intervention promoting a self-transcendent purpose for learning could improve high school science and math grade point average (GPA) over several months. Studies 3 and 4 were short-term experiments that explored possible mechanisms. They showed that the self-transcendent purpose manipulation could increase deeper learning behavior on tedious test review materials (Study 3), and sustain self-regulation over the course of an increasingly boring task (Study 4). More self-oriented motives for learning--such as the desire to have an interesting or enjoyable career--did not, on their own, consistently produce these benefits (Studies 1 and 4).

References

YearCitations

Page 1