Publication | Closed Access
Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels
427
Citations
23
References
1996
Year
Educational PsychologyEducationReasons WellEducation ResearchElementary EducationPsychologySocial SciencesDevelopmental PsychologyTeacher EducationMathematics EducationStudent LearningCognitive DevelopmentSocial ReasoningUnderachieving ChildInformal Reasoning SkillKnowledge LevelsChild PsychologyCognitive ScienceStudent GradeLearning SciencesInstructionInformal LearningReasoningEpistemologyInformal Reasoning
The importance of teaching informal reasoning skill for learning and instruction has been highlighted. The study investigates how reasoning skill relates to student grade, ability, and knowledge levels. The authors conducted two experiments: one with gifted, average, and below‑average students in grades 5, 7, 9, and 11 completing three everyday problem tasks, and a second measuring domain knowledge together with grade and ability. The findings revealed that ability strongly predicts informal reasoning performance, knowledge predicts the number and type of reasons but not soundness or acceptability, grade only increases personal and broadly defined social reasons, and the results support a two‑component model of informal reasoning consisting of a knowledge‑experiential component and an informal reasoning skill component based on argumentation‑based language structures.
This article presents the results of two experiments addressing the relation of reasoning skill to student grade, ability, and knowledge levels. In the first experiment, three levels of students within each of four grades-5, 7, 9, or 1 1-were designated as intellectually gifted, average, or below average. They were given three tasks involving everyday problems for which they provided solutions and justifications. The second experiment included the measurement of domain knowledge with grade and ability level. Measures of informal reasoning showed a substantial relation between ability level and performance, with knowledge significantly related to performance measures, such as number and type of reasons generated, but not to measures involving soundness or acceptability of arguments, which were explained by ability level. Grade was related only to an increase in personal and broadly defined social reasons; other effects were "washed out" by knowledge. The findings were interpreted in terms of a two-component model of informal reasoning, a knowledgeexperiential component and an informal reasoning skill component based on the acquisition of argumentation-based language structures termed conventions of reasoning. Consideration of the relation of reasoning to learning and to instruction emphasized the importance of teaching informal reasoning skill.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1