Translanguaging as a vehicle for epistemic access: cases for reading comprehension and multilingual interactions

Leketi Makalela

Per Linguam · 2015 · 176 citations · 17 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

African multilingualism has traditionally been viewed monoglossically, despite plural language policies in Sub‑Saharan Africa. The study investigates whether alternating input and output languages within lessons can reduce linguistic fixity in monolingual classrooms and offers classroom recommendations. Two translanguaging case studies—one in higher education and one in primary school—illustrate the practice. Results demonstrate that multilingual learners gain cognitive and social benefits, and that fuzzy language boundaries, framed by an ubuntu translanguaging model, enhance epistemic access and reflect pre‑colonial African values.

Abstract

African multilingualism has always been construed from a monoglossic (i.e., one language at a time) lens despite the pretensions of plural language policies in Sub-Saharan Africa. The study reported in this paper explored the efficacy of alternating languages of input and output in the same lessons in order to offset linguistic fixity that is often experienced in monolingual classrooms. I present two case studies of translanguaging practices, one at an institution of higher learning and another in the intermediate phase (primary school). The results from these cases show that the use of more than one language by multilingual learners in classroom settings provides cognitive and social advantages for them. Using what I refer to as the ubuntu translanguaging model, I make a case that fuzziness and blurring of boundaries between languages in the translanguaging classes are (i) necessary and relevant features of the 21st century to enhance epistemic access for speakers in complex multilingual spaces, and that they are (ii) indexical to the pre-colonial African value system of ubuntu. Useful recommendations for classroom applications and further research are considered at the end of the paper.

References

17