Standard-setting Method Comparison

Standard-Setting Method Comparison is a systematic analytical framework used in licensure examination research to evaluate and contrast the psychometric properties, assumptions, and outcomes of different standard-setting methods in order to determine their relative validity, reliability, and impact on cut score accuracy.

88

Publications

3.3K

Citations

207

Authors

102

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

14

Authors

207

  1. CV
    Cees van der Vleuten

    Maastricht University, Netherlands

    8 publications · 499 citations

    8

    h-index

  2. JJ
    John J. Norcini

    Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research, United States

    6 publications · 249 citations

    6

    h-index

  3. MH
    Matt Homer

    University of Leeds, United Kingdom

    5 publications · 80 citations

    5

    h-index

  4. GP
    Godfrey Pell

    University of Leeds, United Kingdom

    4 publications · 117 citations

    4

    h-index

  5. BS
    Barbara S. Plake

    University of Nebraska–Lincoln, United States

    4 publications · 190 citations

    4

    h-index

1–5 of 207

Venues

  1. Medical Teacher

    9 publications · 245 citations

    9

    h-index

  2. Applied Measurement in Education

    7 publications · 331 citations

    7

    h-index

  3. Academic Medicine

    7 publications · 397 citations

    7

    h-index

  4. Medical Education

    6 publications · 350 citations

    6

    h-index

  5. Educational and Psychological Measurement

    5 publications · 129 citations

    5

    h-index

1–5