Cross-Functional Review is a systematic evaluation process within the academic context of Plan Review that integrates expertise and perspectives from multiple disciplinary domains to assess the coherence, feasibility, and innovation of a research contribution, thereby distinguishing it from discipline-specific or siloed review approaches.
7
Publications
254
Citations
22
Authors
10
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
2
Parents
Publications
7
1–5 of 7
Authors
22
- XH
1
h-index
- EV
1
h-index
- RK
1
h-index
- OH
1
h-index
- MS
1
h-index
1–5 of 22
Institutions
10
University of Tulsa
Tulsa, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
66 citations
Copenhagen Business School
Copenhagen, Denmark
1 h-index
1 publications
18 citations
Queensland University of Technology
Brisbane, Australia
1 h-index
6 publications
108 citations
Lund University
Lund, Sweden
1 h-index
2 publications
30 citations
Institut für Handelsforschung
Cologne, Germany
1 h-index
1 publications
15 citations
Myolex (United States)
San Francisco, United States
1 h-index
7 publications
154 citations
Griffith University
Brisbane, Australia
1 h-index
1 publications
66 citations
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
100 citations
1–8 of 10
Venues
- Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
JCER · 1 publications · 15 citations
1
h-index
- Journal of Business Research
JBR · 1 publications · 100 citations
1
h-index
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
1 publications · 15 citations
1
h-index
- Frontiers in Digital Health
1 publications · 22 citations
1
h-index
- Business Horizons
1 publications · 66 citations
1
h-index
1–5