Argumentation With Sources
Argumentation with Sources is a scholarly practice in which a writer constructs a coherent, evidence-based discourse by critically engaging with external sources to support, challenge, or refine claims, thereby integrating them as integral components of the argumentative structure rather than mere citation or summary.
19
Publications
792
Citations
67
Authors
28
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
8
Parents
19
Ivar Bråten, Leila E. Ferguson, Helge I. Strømsø et al. · British Journal of Educational Psychology · 2012 · 123 citations
Highlighting disputed claims on the web
Rob Ennals, Beth Trushkowsky, John Mark Agosta · 2010 · 112 citations
ArgumenText: Searching for Arguments in Heterogeneous Sources
Christian Stab, Johannes Daxenberger, Chris Stahlhut et al. · 2018 · 99 citations · Full text
Language Studies, Linguistics, Computational Linguistics +16
1–5 of 19
67
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 67
28
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
112 citations

Universidad de La Rioja
Logroño, Spain
1 h-index
1 publications
67 citations

University of Hong Kong
Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
1 h-index
1 publications
14 citations
Ubiquitous Energy (United States)
Redwood City, United States
1 h-index
8 publications
792 citations

University of Borås
Borås, Sweden
1 h-index
2 publications
38 citations

Technische Universität Darmstadt
Darmstadt, Germany
1 h-index
8 publications
792 citations
Stanford University
Stanford, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
20 citations
University of Maryland, College Park
College Park, United States
1 h-index
3 publications
249 citations
1–8 of 28
Repository · 1 publications · 20 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 20 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 14 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 123 citations
1
h-index
AJIM · 1 publications · 19 citations
1
h-index
1–5