Practices, Roles, and Responsibilities of Middle Managers in Program and Portfolio Management

Tomas Blomquist, Ralf Müller

Project Management Journal · 2006 · 145 citations · 31 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study builds on prior research by the Project Management Institute, summarizing key findings from Blomquist & Müller (2006). The study investigates middle managers’ practices, roles, and responsibilities in program and portfolio management, developing a contingency model from a transaction‑cost economics perspective. Using a transaction‑cost economics framework, the authors develop a contingency model for middle‑manager roles in program and portfolio management. High‑performing organizations employ dedicated portfolio‑management processes, tools, and middle‑manager roles to manage complexity, whereas low‑performing organizations lack these practices, and the study discusses managerial and theoretical implications.

Abstract

Practices for program and portfolio management, together with the associated roles and responsibilities of middle managers, were investigated. The results of the multi-method study show that high-performing organizations apply dedicated portfolio management processes and tools, plus use the associated roles of middle managers, to address the requirements stemming from the complexity of the organization's environment and the types of projects executed. This is not the case in low-performing organizations. The study takes a transaction costs economics perspective and develops a contingency model for program/portfolio management roles of middle managers. Managerial and theoretical implications are also discussed. This paper summarizes the highlights of research findings that can be found in the full report published by the Project Management Institute (PMI) (Blomquist & Müller, 2006).

References

31