Clinical Cancer Research · 2025 · 10 citations · 24 references
MedicineHematologyPharmacologyCancer PharmacologyHematologic OncologyOncology PharmacotherapyDose EscalationHematologic Malignancy PharmacotherapyHematologic Malignancy TherapyMyelodysplastic SyndromesToxicity ManagementAcute Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentMyelodysplastic Syndrome TherapyMyelodysplastic Syndrome TreatmentMyeloid NeoplasmsRefractory Acute Myeloid LeukemiaRefractory Myelodysplastic SyndromeRelapsed Acute Myeloid LeukemiaRelapsed Leukemia
PURPOSE: Safety and preliminary clinical activity of FHD-286, a dual BRG1/BRM (Brahma related gene 1/Brahma homolog) inhibitor, were evaluated in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, phase I, dose-escalation study (NCT04891757), patients received FHD-286 orally once daily at 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg. RESULTS: Forty patients (median age: 65.5 years; 85% with adverse genetic status; and 65% with ≥3 prior therapy lines) received FHD-286 for 28 days (median). FHD-286 was not tolerated at 10 mg once daily. Across all doses, treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were predominantly grade 1 to 2, most commonly dry mouth (27.5%) and increased alanine aminotransferase (20%). Dose-limiting grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia and grade 3 muscular weakness occurred at 5 and 10 mg once daily, respectively. The most common serious TRAE was differentiation syndrome (DS; 10%). An independent committee retrospectively adjudicated DS in 15% of patients (grade 3 in 5 patients and grade 4 in 1 patient). FHD-286 plasma exposure increased with dose and accumulated with continuous dosing. Exposures were typically higher with concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitors. Myeloid differentiation and leukemic burden reduction were observed across cytogenetic and mutational backgrounds, notably in patients with enhancer-driven genotypes. There were no objective responses. CONCLUSIONS: DS was the most frequent serious TRAE. Although antileukemic activity was observed, no objective responses were achieved, and disease progression frequently occurred within 1 to 2 treatment cycles. Blast reductions were reported across cytogenetic and mutational profiles, coupled with myeloid differentiation via BRG1/BRM inhibition. This novel mechanism warrants further investigation of FHD-286 in combination with other agents in myeloid malignancies.
24
Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony
Ilya Korsunsky, Nghia Millard, Jean Fan et al. · Nature Methods · 2019 · 10.5K citations · Full text
Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq
Itay Tirosh, Benjamin Izar, Sanjay M. Prakadan et al. · Science · 2016 · 5.2K citations · Full text
Defining a Cancer Dependency Map
Aviad Tsherniak, Francisca Vázquez, Phil Montgomery et al. · Cell · 2017 · 3.5K citations · Full text
Bruce D. Cheson, John M. Bennett, Thomas Büchner et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2003 · 2.7K citations
Medicine, Hematology, Oncology +17