International Journal of Management Reviews · 2024 · 416 citations · 67 references
NursingLiteraturePlanning TheorySource StudiesSystematicsBibliometric AnalysisCritical Appraisal Of ResearchLiterature Review MethodsSystematic ReviewSystematic Review MethodologySystematic Review MethodsBibliometric SynthesisLiterature Review DesignLiterature Review SynthesisMethodological ReviewResearch Objectives AlignmentResearch Objectives FormulationStudy Selection ProcessSystematic Literature Review
Academic output has risen sharply, leading to a surge in bibliometric and systematic literature reviews, yet combined approaches lack coherent methodological guidance. The article proposes integrated guidelines for a Bibliometric‑Systematic Literature Review (B‑SLR), a flexible toolbox for diverse research objectives across the miner–prospector continuum. The authors present a 10‑step process, detailing critical decisions, best practices, and core pillars—critical analysis, timeliness, coverage, rigor, coherence, and originality—supported by a companion website (https://www.b‑slr.org).
Abstract The steady increase in academic production has been paralleled by a surge in the number of bibliometric and systematic literature reviews (SLRs) published. Over the years, scholars began to combine bibliometric analyses with SLRs. However, such combined approaches relied on fragmented methodological suggestions without clear guiding frameworks. This article introduces integrated guidelines for undertaking multi‐method literature reviews, combining bibliometric analyses with SLRs and theory development, which we call ‘Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Review’ (B‐SLR). In doing so, we develop a 10‐step process on how to apply the B‐SLR. In each of the proposed steps, we discuss critical decisions and best practices to support researchers while crafting meaningful and theoretically relevant literature reviews. The B‐SLR is intended as a flexible toolbox designed to accommodate diverse research objectives in the miner–prospector continuum, spanning from reviewing, theorising, tracing future roadmaps or creating bridges among different topics. The B‐SLR incorporates the pillars of critical analysis, timeliness, coverage, rigour, coherence and originality of contribution, also emphasising the need for a novel and relevant theoretical contribution. The B‐SLR is supported by a companion website, providing additional resources to assist researchers in this 10‐step process: https://www.b‐slr.org .
67
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt et al. · BMJ · 2021 · 95K citations · Full text
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman · Scientometrics · 2009 · 19.8K citations · Full text
Basics of Qualitative Research
Julie L. Ozanne, Anselm Strauss, Juliet Corbin · Journal of Marketing Research · 1992 · 17.9K citations
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines
Naveen Donthu, Satish Kumar, Debmalya Mukherjee et al. · Journal of Business Research · 2021 · 12.2K citations