British Journal of Pharmacology · 2024 · 11 citations · 51 references
MedicineMedicinal ChemistryPharmacologyCell SignalingDrug DiscoverySignal TransductionLigand BindingReceptor BindingReceptor ModelingReceptor PharmacologyReceptor-ligand InteractionsReceptor-mediated SignalingCardioprotective TherapyMolecular Docking AnalysisPro-resolving Receptor SignalingReceptor Activation ModelingReceptor Ligand ProfilingReceptor Selectivity ProfilingReceptor-ligand Structural Biologyβ-Arrestin-mediated Internalization
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in developing FPR2 agonists (compound 43, ACT-389949 and BMS-986235) as potential pro-resolving therapeutics, with ACT-389949 and BMS-986235 having entered phase I clinical development. FPR2 activation leads to diverse downstream outputs. ACT-389949 was observed to cause rapid tachyphylaxis, while BMS-986235 and compound 43 induced cardioprotective effects in preclinical models. We aim to characterise the differences in ligand-receptor engagement and downstream signalling and trafficking bias profile. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: ) was obtained from the operational model for bias analysis using WKYMVm as a reference ligand. Docking of FPR2 ligands into the active FPR2 cryoEM structure (PDBID: 7T6S) was performed using ICM pro software. KEY RESULTS: Bias analysis revealed that WKYMVm and ACT-389949 shared a very similar bias profile. In comparison, BMS-986235 and compound 43 displayed approximately 5- to 50-fold bias away from β-arrestin recruitment and trafficking pathways, while being 35- to 60-fold biased towards cAMP inhibition and pERK1/2. Molecular docking predicted key amino acid interactions at the FPR2 shared between WKYMVm and ACT-389949, but not with BMS-986235 and compound 43. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: In vitro characterisation demonstrated that WKYMVm and ACT-389949 differ from BMS-986235 and compound 43 in their signalling and protein coupling profile. This observation may be explained by differences in the ligand-receptor interactions. In vitro characterisation provided significant insights into identifying the desired bias profile for FPR2-based pharmacotherapy.
51
U1 snRNP regulates cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro
Jung‐Min Oh, Christopher C. Venters, Chao Di et al. · Nature Communications · 2020 · 7.2K citations · Full text
Conformational biosensors reveal GPCR signalling from endosomes
Roshanak Irannejad, Jin C. Tomshine, Jon R. Tomshine et al. · Nature · 2013 · 840 citations · Full text
Michelle Glass, Christian C. Felder · Journal of Neuroscience · 1997 · 636 citations · Full text