JAMA Network Open · 2023 · 49 citations · 32 references
MedicineClinical SciencesOncologyMetastasisNeoplasiaPrecision OncologyCancer Precision MedicineClinical GenomicsMalignant NeoplasmsMetastatic Cancer ManagementMolecular Tumor ProfilingActionable Genomic AlterationsClinical Utility AnalysisClinical Utility AssessmentGenomic Alteration ProfilingPersonalized Cancer TreatmentSomatic Genomic AlterationsTargeted Molecular TherapyTumor Genomic Profiling
IMPORTANCE: Precision oncology using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) by next-generation sequencing is aimed at companion diagnosis and genomic profiling. The clinical utility of CGP before the standard of care (SOC) is still not resolved, and more evidence is needed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical utility of next-generation CGP (FoundationOne CDx [F1CDx]) in patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent solid tumors. DESIGN, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study enrolled patients with previously untreated advanced solid tumors between May 18, 2021, and February 16, 2022, with follow-up through August 16, 2022. The study was conducted at 6 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent cancers in the gastrointestinal or biliary tract; pancreas, lung, breast, uterus, or ovary; and malignant melanoma. EXPOSURE: Comprehensive genomic profiling testing before SOC for advanced solid tumors. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportion of patients with actionable or druggable genomic alterations and molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT). RESULTS: A total of 183 patients met the inclusion criteria and 180 patients (92 men [51.1%]) with a median age of 64 years (range, 23-88 years) subsequently underwent CGP (lung [n = 28], colon/small intestine [n = 27], pancreas [n = 27], breast [n = 25], biliary tract [n = 20], gastric [n = 19], uterus [n = 12], esophagus [n = 10], ovary [n = 6], and skin melanoma [n = 6]). Data from 172 patients were available for end point analyses. Actionable alterations were found in 172 patients (100.0%; 95% CI, 97.9%-100.0%) and druggable alternations were identified in 109 patients (63.4%; 95% CI, 55.7%-70.6%). The molecular tumor board identified MBRT for 105 patients (61.0%; 95% CI, 53.3%-68.4%). Genomic alterations included in the companion diagnostics list of the CGP test were found in 49 patients (28.5%; 95% CI, 21.9%-35.9%) in a tumor-agnostic setting. After a median follow-up of 7.9 months (range, 0.5-13.2 months), 34 patients (19.8%; 95% CI, 14.1%-26.5%) received MBRT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this study suggest that CGP testing before SOC for patients with advanced solid tumors may be clinically beneficial to guide the subsequent anticancer therapies, including molecularly matched treatments.
32
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki
JAMA · 2013 · 29.4K citations
Ahmet Zehir, Ryma Benayed, Ronak Shah et al. · Nature Medicine · 2017 · 3.5K citations
Aurélien Marabelle, Dung T. Le, Paolo A. Ascierto et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2019 · 3K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Immunology, Oncology +17
Alpelisib for <i>PIK3CA</i> -Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Fabrice André, Eva Ciruelos, Gábor Rubovszky et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2019 · 2.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17