Archives of Toxicology · 2023 · 40 citations · 30 references
PharmacyGeneticsToxicologyGenomicsMedical GeneticsPharmacogenomicsDna SequencingGenotoxicity AssessmentGenotoxicity TestingMutagenicity AssessmentMutation AnalysisBone Marrow AssessmentDuplex SequencingGenetic Mutation FrequencyMammalian Cell Gene Mutation AssaysMammalian Cell Mutagenicity AssaysMutagenesis AssaysMutation Frequency MeasurementMutation Induction Frequency
Mutagenicity testing is an essential component of health safety assessment. Duplex Sequencing (DS), an emerging high-accuracy DNA sequencing technology, may provide substantial advantages over conventional mutagenicity assays. DS could be used to eliminate reliance on standalone reporter assays and provide mechanistic information alongside mutation frequency (MF) data. However, the performance of DS must be thoroughly assessed before it can be routinely implemented for standard testing. We used DS to study spontaneous and procarbazine (PRC)-induced mutations in the bone marrow (BM) of MutaMouse males across a panel of 20 diverse genomic targets. Mice were exposed to 0, 6.25, 12.5, or 25 mg/kg-bw/day for 28 days by oral gavage and BM sampled 42 days post-exposure. Results were compared with those obtained using the conventional lacZ viral plaque assay on the same samples. DS detected significant increases in mutation frequencies and changes to mutation spectra at all PRC doses. Low intra-group variability within DS samples allowed for detection of increases at lower doses than the lacZ assay. While the lacZ assay initially yielded a higher fold-change in mutant frequency than DS, inclusion of clonal mutations in DS mutation frequencies reduced this discrepancy. Power analyses suggested that three animals per dose group and 500 million duplex base pairs per sample is sufficient to detect a 1.5-fold increase in mutations with > 80% power. Overall, we demonstrate several advantages of DS over classical mutagenicity assays and provide data to support efforts to identify optimal study designs for the application of DS as a regulatory test.
30
The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer
Mi Ni Huang, Alvin Wei Tian Ng, Arnoud Boot et al. · Nature · 2020 · 3.7K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Genetics, Oncology +14
GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes
Adam Frankish, Mark Diekhans, Anne-Maud Ferreira et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 2018 · 3.5K citations · Full text
Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences
Serena Nik‐Zainal, Helen Davies, Johan Staaf et al. · Nature · 2016 · 2.3K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Genetics, Oncology +14
Deciphering Signatures of Mutational Processes Operative in Human Cancer
Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Serena Nik‐Zainal, David C. Wedge et al. · Cell Reports · 2013 · 1.4K citations · Full text
A Compendium of Mutational Signatures of Environmental Agents
Jill E. Kucab, Xueqing Zou, Sandro Morganella et al. · Cell · 2019 · 692 citations · Full text