Publication | Open Access
Development of the “Performance Competence Evaluation Measure”
37
Citations
13
References
2009
Year
Physical ActivityMeasurement ToolEducationPerformance MeasurementProgram EvaluationMovement AnalysisDance PerformancePhysical EducationPerformance AssessmentManagementDance MedicineDance For HealthSkilled PerformanceSport ScienceOrganizational PerformanceModern DanceDanceNational StudiesPhysical FitnessArtsContemporary DanceChoreographyFaculty MembersChoreographic ProcessCompetence-based ManagementDance HistoryPerformance StudiesPerformance MeasureCelebration StudiesEducational AssessmentHuman MovementAthletic Training
The project had two phases. The aim of this study was to develop a measurement tool, the “Performance Competence Evaluation Measure” (PCEM), for the evaluation of qualitative aspects of dance performance. The authors conducted a literature review of existing tools and dance theory, then developed PCEM and tested its validity and reliability with three professional judges reviewing videotaped performances of 20 dancers over two sessions eight weeks apart. Intra‑rater and inter‑rater reliability were 0.95 and 0.94, indicating PCEM is a reliable tool for future dance science research.
The aim of this study was to develop a measurement tool, the “Performance Competence Evaluation Measure” (PCEM), for the evaluation of qualitative aspects of dance performance. The project had two phases. In the first phase a literature review was conducted to examine 1. the previous development of similar measurement tools, 2. descriptions of dance technique and dance performance applicable to the development of a qualitative measurement tool, and 3. theoretical models from somatic practices that evaluate and assess qualitative aspects of movement and dance activity. The second phase involved the development of a system for using PCEM, and testing its validity and reliability. Three judges from the professional dance community volunteered to test PCEM with a sample of 20 subjects from low-intermediate to advanced classes at a university dance program. The subjects learned a dance combination and were videotaped performing it on two separate occasions, eight weeks apart. The judges reviewed the videos in random order. Logical validity of PCEM was established through assessment by two faculty members of the university dance department and the three judges. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability demonstrated correlation coefficients of 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. It was concluded that PCEM can serve as a useful measurement tool for future dance science research.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1