Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · 2022 · 21 citations · 45 references
MedicineImmunologyOncologyImmunotherapyMolecular OncologyTumor ImmunologyAntitumor T Cell ResponsesCancer ImmunotherapyChimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell TherapyT Cell Responses To TumorsTargeted Cancer TherapyTargeted TherapyCar T Cell TrialsCytotoxicity AssaysGenetic Alterations In ResistanceMet-targeted TherapyT Cell CytotoxicityT Cell Receptor-engineered T CellsT-cell Receptor-engineered T CellsTumor Antigen-based Immunotherapy
BACKGROUND: Aberrant activation of the MET receptor in cancer is sustained by genetic alterations or, more frequently, by transcriptional upregulations. A fraction of MET-amplified or mutated tumors are sensible to MET targeting agents, but their responsiveness is typically short-lasting, as secondary resistance eventually occurs. Since in the absence of genetic alterations MET is usually not a tumor driver, MET overexpressing tumors are not/poorly responsive to MET targeted therapies. Consequently, the vast majority of tumors exhibiting MET activation still represent an unmet medical need. METHODS: Here we propose an immunotherapy strategy based on T lymphocytes expressing a Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) targeting MET overexpressing tumors of different histotypes. We engineered two different MET-CAR constructs and tested MET-CAR-T cell cytotoxic activity against different MET overexpressing models, including tumor cell lines, primary cancer cells, organoids, and xenografts in immune-deficient mice. RESULTS: We proved that MET-CAR-T exerted a specific cytotoxic activity against MET expressing cells. Cell killing was proportional to the level of MET expressed on the cell surface. While CAR-T cytotoxicity was minimal versus cells carrying MET at physiological levels, essentially sparing normal cells, the activity versus MET overexpressing tumors was robust, significantly controlling tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Notably, MET-CAR-T cells were also able to brake acquired resistance to MET targeting agents in MET amplified cancer cells carrying secondary mutations in downstream signal transducers. CONCLUSIONS: We set and validated at the pre-clinical level a MET-CAR immunotherapy strategy potentially beneficial for cancers not eligible for MET targeted therapy with inhibitory molecules, including those exhibiting primary or secondary resistance.
45
Long-Term Follow-up of CD19 CAR Therapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Jae H. Park, Isabelle Rivière, Mithat Gönen et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2018 · 2.7K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Hematology, Oncology +17
Tepotinib in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with <i>MET</i> Exon 14 Skipping Mutations
Paul K. Paik, Enriqueta Felip, Rémi Veillon et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2020 · 854 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +15
Heparanase promotes tumor infiltration and antitumor activity of CAR-redirected T lymphocytes
Ignazio Caruana, Barbara Savoldo, Valentina Hoyos et al. · Nature Medicine · 2015 · 786 citations · Full text
Medicine, Immunology, Oncology +16