Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · 2022 · 26 citations · 25 references
Life SciencesImmunologyMicrobiologyGastroenterologyMedical MicrobiologyMucosal ImmunologyEosinophilic DisordersEosinophilic Gastrointestinal DisordersEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal EndoscopySalivary MicrobiologySalivary Microbiome AnalysisAmplicon Sequence Variant AnalysisAmplicon Sequence VariantsDisease Activity MeasurementEosinophilic Gastrointestinal InflammationEosinophilic InfiltratesGut Microbiota CompositionSalivary Microbiota In DiseaseSalivary Microbiota In Health
BACKGROUND: Data on the role of the microbiome in adult patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) are limited. AIMS: To prospectively collect and characterise the salivary, oesophageal and gastric microbiome in patients with EoE, further correlating the findings with disease activity. METHODS: Adult patients with symptoms of oesophageal dysfunction undergoing upper endoscopy were consecutively enrolled. Patients were classified as EoE patients, in case of more than 15 eosinophils per high-power field, or non-EoE controls, in case of lack of eosinophilic infiltration. Before and during endoscopy, saliva, oesophageal and gastric fundus biopsies were collected. Microbiota assessment was performed by 16 s rRNA analysis. A Sparse Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (sPLS-DA) was implemented to identify biomarkers. RESULTS: Saliva samples were collected from 29 EoE patients and 20 non-EoE controls;, biopsies from 25 EoE and 5 non-EoE controls. In saliva samples, 23 Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) were positively associated with EoE and 27 ASVs with controls, making it possible to discriminate between EoE and non-EoE patients with a classification error (CE) of 24%. In a validation cohort, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of this model were 78.6%, 80%, 75%, 80% and 60%, respectively. Moreover, the analysis of oesophageal microbiota samples observed a clear microbial pattern able to discriminate between active and inactive EoE (CE = 8%). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest that salivary metabarcoding analysis in combination with machine learning approaches could become a valid, cheap, non-invasive test to segregate between EoE and non-EoE patients.
25
DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data
Benjamin J. Callahan, Paul J. McMurdie, Michael Rosen et al. · Nature Methods · 2016 · 36.3K citations
mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration
Florian Rohart, Benoît Gautier, Amrit Singh et al. · PLoS Computational Biology · 2017 · 3.9K citations · Full text