New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 603 citations · 31 references
AgricultureNutritionNutritional SciencesClinical NutritionHuman NutritionNutritional Support In Critical CareCritical Care NutritionMalnutritionNutrition SupportNutritional SupportProtein RequirementsUndernutrition90-Day MortalityCaloric IntakeCritical Care Nutrition TherapyNutrition In Critical IllnessPermissive FeedingPrimary Outcome AnalysisProtein Intake AdequacyProtein Requirements Assessment
BACKGROUND: The appropriate caloric goal for critically ill adults is unclear. We evaluated the effect of restriction of nonprotein calories (permissive underfeeding), as compared with standard enteral feeding, on 90-day mortality among critically ill adults, with maintenance of the full recommended amount of protein in both groups. METHODS: At seven centers, we randomly assigned 894 critically ill adults with a medical, surgical, or trauma admission category to permissive underfeeding (40 to 60% of calculated caloric requirements) or standard enteral feeding (70 to 100%) for up to 14 days while maintaining a similar protein intake in the two groups. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups; 96.8% of the patients were receiving mechanical ventilation. During the intervention period, the permissive-underfeeding group received fewer mean (±SD) calories than did the standard-feeding group (835±297 kcal per day vs. 1299±467 kcal per day, P<0.001; 46±14% vs. 71±22% of caloric requirements, P<0.001). Protein intake was similar in the two groups (57±24 g per day and 59±25 g per day, respectively; P=0.29). The 90-day mortality was similar: 121 of 445 patients (27.2%) in the permissive-underfeeding group and 127 of 440 patients (28.9%) in the standard-feeding group died (relative risk with permissive underfeeding, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.16; P=0.58). No serious adverse events were reported; there were no significant between-group differences with respect to feeding intolerance, diarrhea, infections acquired in the intensive care unit (ICU), or ICU or hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral feeding to deliver a moderate amount of nonprotein calories to critically ill adults was not associated with lower mortality than that associated with planned delivery of a full amount of nonprotein calories. (Funded by the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center; PermiT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN68144998.).
31
William A. Knaus, Elizabeth A. Draper, Douglas P. Wagner et al. · Critical Care Medicine · 1985 · 13.7K citations
Medicine, Internal Medicine, Clinical Classification Systems +16
Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients
Greet Van den Berghe, Pieter Wouters, Frank Weekers et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2001 · 10K citations · Full text
Calorie Restriction Promotes Mammalian Cell Survival by Inducing the SIRT1 Deacetylase
Haim Cohen, Christine Miller, Kevin J. Bitterman et al. · Science · 2004 · 1.9K citations
Early versus Late Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Adults
Michaël P. Casaer, Dieter Mesotten, Greet Hermans et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 1.7K citations · Full text