F1000Research · 2016 · 24 citations · 35 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyDrug DiscoveryMolecular OncologyPharmacogenomicsCancer BiomarkersCancer GenomicsCancer TranscriptomicsCellular Response ProfilingComputational OncologyMolecular Tumor ProfilingCancer Cell Line ModelsCell Line Sensitivity ProfilingCross-validationGene Expression SignaturesK-fold Cross-validationK-fold ValidationRandom Forest ClassificationTumor Pharmacogenomic Profiling
<ns4:p> <ns4:italic>Background:</ns4:italic> Selected gene mutations are routinely used to guide the selection of cancer drugs for a given patient tumour. Large pharmacogenomic data sets were introduced to discover more of these single-gene markers of drug sensitivity. Very recently, machine learning regression has been used to investigate how well cancer cell line sensitivity to drugs is predicted depending on the type of molecular profile. The latter has revealed that gene expression data is the most predictive profile in the pan-cancer setting. However, no study to date has exploited GDSC data to systematically compare the performance of machine learning models based on multi-gene expression data against that of widely-used single-gene markers based on genomics data. <ns4:italic>Methods:</ns4:italic> Here we present this systematic comparison using Random Forest (RF) classifiers exploiting the expression levels of 13,321 genes and an average of 501 tested cell lines per drug. To account for time-dependent batch effects in IC <ns4:sub>50</ns4:sub> measurements, we employ independent test sets generated with more recent GDSC data than that used to train the predictors and show that this is a more realistic validation than K-fold cross-validation. <ns4:italic>Results and Discussion:</ns4:italic> Across 127 GDSC drugs, our results show that the single-gene markers unveiled by the MANOVA analysis tend to achieve higher precision than these RF-based multi-gene models, at the cost of generally having a poor recall (i.e. correctly detecting only a small part of the cell lines sensitive to the drug). Regarding overall classification performance, about two thirds of the drugs are better predicted by multi-gene RF classifiers. Among the drugs with the most predictive of these models, we found pyrimethamine, sunitinib and 17-AAG. <ns4:italic>Conclusions:</ns4:italic> We now know that this type of models can predict <ns4:italic>in vitro</ns4:italic> tumour response to these drugs. These models can thus be further investigated on <ns4:italic>in vivo</ns4:italic> tumour models. </ns4:p>
35
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 126.2K citations · Full text
The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity
Jordi Barretina, Giordano Caponigro, Nicolas Stransky et al. · Nature · 2012 · 8.5K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +15
Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells
Mathew J. Garnett, Elena J. Edelman, Sonja J. Heidorn et al. · Nature · 2012 · 2.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cancer Biology, Oncology +16
A Landscape of Pharmacogenomic Interactions in Cancer
Francesco Iorio, Theo Knijnenburg, Daniël J. Vis et al. · Cell · 2016 · 2.3K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cancer Biology, Oncology +17