Publication | Closed Access
A Critical Comparison of Offline Focus Groups, Online Focus Groups and E-Delphi
75
Citations
13
References
2009
Year
EngineeringOnline ExperimentDigital MarketingConsumer ResearchCommunicationOnline Customer BehaviorOnline Focus GroupsOnline CommunityManagementMarketing CommunicationConsumer BehaviorTelehealthOffline Focus GroupsOnline Marketing ResearchWeb-based CollaborationComputer-mediated CommunicationMedia MarketingUser ExperienceGroup InteractionIntegrated MarketingInformation AccessInformation ManagementMarketing InsightsMarketingCritical ComparisonGroup CommunicationSocial ComputingInteractive MarketingWeb Survey MethodHuman-computer InteractionTechnologyPersuasionSurvey Methodology
The boom in online marketing research represents one of the fastest-growing segments of the research industry. Although the design and quality of online surveys has received widespread attention, little empirical research compares the effectiveness of online and offline qualitative research techniques. Therefore, this research compares offline focus groups, online focus groups and e-Delphi with respect to depth, breadth, efficiency, group dynamics, non-verbal impressions and attitudes of respondents. Results show that offline focus group results have the highest depth and breadth, and are most efficient, leading to high-quality outcomes. However, e-Delphi discussions provide very elaborate and relatively deep outcomes that give a good impression of respondents’ feelings and attitudes. Results from online focus groups remain rather superficial, but experts value the spontaneous reactions and interactiveness, and consider online focus groups very efficient.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1