American Law and Economics Review · 2013 · 19 citations · 10 references
BusinessAccountancyAccountingCorporate DisclosureFinancial AccountingSecurities RegulationFinancial CrimeFinancial Statement AuditsEvent StudiesFinancial Reporting IrregularitiesFinancial Statement InvestigationsMarket Reaction To DisclosureMarket Reactions To Accounting InformationParallel Criminal ProceedingsPenaltiesSecurities And Exchange Commission Oversight
We study the SEC’s allocation of enforcement resources in the wake of a salient public scandal. We focus on the SEC’s investigations of option backdating in the wake of numerous media articles on the practice of backdating. We find that the SEC shifted its mix of investigations significantly toward backdating investigations and away from investigations involving other accounting issues. We test the hypothesis that SEC pursued more marginal investigations into backdating at the expense of pursuing more egregious accounting issues. Our event study of stock market reactions to the initial disclosure of backdating investigations shows that those reactions declined over our sample period. We also find that later backdating investigations are less likely to target individuals and less likely to be accompanied by a parallel criminal investigation. Looking at the consequences of the SEC’s backdating investigations, later investigations were more likely to be terminated or produce no monetary penalties. We find that the magnitude of the option backdating accounting errors diminished over time relative to other accounting errors that attracted SEC investigations.
10
On the Timing of CEO Stock Option Awards
Erik Lie · Management Science · 2005 · 552 citations
Option Backdating and Board Interlocks
John M. Bizjak, Michael L. Lemmon, Ryan J. Whitby · Review of Financial Studies · 2009 · 480 citations