British Journal of Cancer · 2020 · 188 citations · 18 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyGastrointestinal OncologyMetastasisTumor ProgressionCancer Survival AnalysisColorectal CancerMalignant NeoplasmsMetastatic Cancer ManagementMetastatic Disease ManagementCetuximab TherapyColorectal Cancer PrognosisPer-protocol Effect EstimationWild-type Ras Function
BACKGROUND: Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI improved overall survival compared with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in FIRE-3, but no corresponding benefit was found for progression-free survival. This analysis aimed to determine whether cetuximab improves response and survival versus bevacizumab among response-evaluable patients receiving first-line FOLFIRI for RAS wild-type mCRC and the effect of primary tumour side on outcomes. METHODS: The intent-to-treat population included 593 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC. Further testing identified 400 patients with extended RAS wild-type disease; of these, 352 (88%) who received ≥3 cycles of therapy and had ≥1 post-baseline scan were evaluable for response and constituted the per-protocol population (169 cetuximab and 183 bevacizumab). Patients received 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with either weekly cetuximab or biweekly bevacizumab given on day 1 of each 14-day cycle until response, progression or toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The effect of primary tumour location was evaluated. RESULTS: Median OS in the RAS wild-type population was 31 vs 26 months in the cetuximab and bevacizumab groups, respectively (HR 0.76, P = 0.012). In the per-protocol population, outcomes favoured cetuximab for ORR (77% vs 65%, P = 0.014) and median OS (33 vs 26 months, HR 0.75, P = 0.011), while PFS was comparable between groups. The advantage of cetuximab over bevacizumab occurred only in patients with left-sided primary tumours. CONCLUSIONS: FOLFIRI plus cetuximab resulted in a significantly higher ORR and longer OS compared to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab among patients with left-sided tumours. The superior response associated with cetuximab may particularly benefit patients with symptomatic tumours or borderline-resectable metastases. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00433927.
18
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Cetuximab and Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Eric Van Cutsem, Claus-Henning Köhne, Erika Hitre et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2009 · 3.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Eric Van Cutsem, Andrés Cervantes, René Adam et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2016 · 3.4K citations · Full text
Panitumumab–FOLFOX4 Treatment and <i>RAS</i> Mutations in Colorectal Cancer
Jean‐Yves Douillard, Kelly S. Oliner, Salvatore Siena et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 2.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +15