Genes · 2020 · 37 citations · 29 references
Life SciencesGeneticsOncologyEpigeneticsEpigenomicsGenomicsCancer BiomarkersCancer GenomicsDeep LearningDifferential Expression AnalysisDna Methylation ProfilingGene Expression ProfilingCancer BioinformaticsCancer Genomic Biomarker DiscoveryDeep Feature LearningDeep Learning-based Gene PredictionDifferentially Methylated RegionsDna Methylation MappingGene Expression SignaturesMethylation-based Tumor Classification
DNA methylation change has been useful for cancer biomarker discovery, classification, and potential treatment development. So far, existing methods use either differentially methylated CpG sites or combined CpG sites, namely differentially methylated regions, that can be mapped to genes. However, such methylation signal mapping has limitations. To address these limitations, in this study, we introduced a combinatorial framework using linear regression, differential expression, deep learning method for accurate biological interpretation of DNA methylation through integrating DNA methylation data and corresponding TCGA gene expression data. We demonstrated it for uterine cervical cancer. First, we pre-filtered outliers from the data set and then determined the predicted gene expression value from the pre-filtered methylation data through linear regression. We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by Empirical Bayes test using Limma. Then we applied a deep learning method, “nnet” to classify the cervical cancer label of those DEGs to determine all classification metrics including accuracy and area under curve (AUC) through 10-fold cross validation. We applied our approach to uterine cervical cancer DNA methylation dataset (NCBI accession ID: GSE30760, 27,578 features covering 63 tumor and 152 matched normal samples). After linear regression and differential expression analysis, we obtained 6287 DEGs with false discovery rate (FDR) <0.001. After performing deep learning analysis, we obtained average classification accuracy 90.69% (±1.97%) of the uterine cervical cancerous labels. This performance is better than that of other peer methods. We performed in-degree and out-degree hub gene network analysis using Cytoscape. We reported five top in-degree genes (PAIP2, GRWD1, VPS4B, CRADD and LLPH) and five top out-degree genes (MRPL35, FAM177A1, STAT4, ASPSCR1 and FABP7). After that, we performed KEGG pathway and Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of DEGs using tool WebGestalt(WEB-based Gene SeT AnaLysis Toolkit). In summary, our proposed framework that integrated linear regression, differential expression, deep learning provides a robust approach to better interpret DNA methylation analysis and gene expression data in disease study.
29
Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks
Paul Shannon, Andrew Markiel, Owen Ozier et al. · Genome Research · 2003 · 54.3K citations · Full text
voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts
Charity W. Law, Yunshun Chen, Wei Shi et al. · Genome biology · 2014 · 6.7K citations · Full text
GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions
Cory Y. McLean, Dave Bristor, Michael Hiller et al. · Nature Biotechnology · 2010 · 5K citations