IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics · 2020 · 24 citations · 17 references
EngineeringElectrical EngineeringMaterials ScienceElectronic MaterialsSemiconductor DevicesSemiconductor MaterialsDevice CharacterizationElectrical CharacterizationPhotovoltaic MaterialsSemiconductor Device MaterialsSolar Cell MaterialsSolar CellsContact LossesCurrent DensityDark CurrentRecombination LossesRecombination ProcessesResistivity MeasurementSaturation CurrentSolar Cell Characterization
Reliable characterization techniques to accurately quantify the metallization-induced recombination losses as well as contact resistivity losses of screen-printed cells are crucial for successful optimization of the contact grid design. Previously, the dark saturation current density at the contact (J <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0c</sub> ) is often assumed to be constant for different finger width. Similarly, impact of finger width on contact resistivity (ρc) is rarely reported. Therefore, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of J <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0c</sub> and ρ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">c</sub> as a function of finger width, spacing as well as firing temperature. We found out that J0c increases from ≈2000 to ≈8100 fA/cm2, when the finger width increases from 60 to 400 μm; and ρ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">c</sub> decrease from 7.2 to 2.2 mΩ · cm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> when using a wide-TLM rather than a narrow-TLM structure, for samples fired at 840 °C. Based on our cross-sectional and top-down scanning electron microscopy images, we believe that the physical root cause can be explained by the difference in the microstructure formed at the metal-silicon interface during the firing process for the screen-printed contacts.
17
Mohamed M. Hilali, Srinivasan Sridharan, Chandra Khadilkar et al. · Journal of Electronic Materials · 2006 · 123 citations