Briefings in Bioinformatics · 2020 · 20 citations · 86 references
Life SciencesBioinformaticsOncologyCancer GeneticsGenomic Data AnalysisGenomicsCancer Genome SequencingCancer GenomicsNext-generation SequencingVariant AnalysisVariant CallingVariant DetectionBioinformatic PipelinesHigh-throughput Sequencing AnalysisSomatic Variant AnalysisSomatic Variant CallingSomatic Variant DetectionVariant Call Quality AssessmentVariant Interpretation In OncologyVariant Quality Control
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has revolutionised human cancer research, particularly via detection of genomic variants with its ultra-high-throughput sequencing and increasing affordability. However, the inundation of rich cancer genomics data has resulted in significant challenges in its exploration and translation into biological insights. One of the difficulties in cancer genome sequencing is software selection. Currently, multiple tools are widely used to process NGS data in four stages: raw sequence data pre-processing and quality control (QC), sequence alignment, variant calling and annotation and visualisation. However, the differences between these NGS tools, including their installation, merits, drawbacks and application, have not been fully appreciated. Therefore, a systematic review of the functionality and performance of NGS tools is required to provide cancer researchers with guidance on software and strategy selection. Another challenge is the multidimensional QC of sequencing data because QC can not only report varied sequence data characteristics but also reveal deviations in diverse features and is essential for a meaningful and successful study. However, monitoring of QC metrics in specific steps including alignment and variant calling is neglected in certain pipelines such as the 'Best Practices Workflows' in GATK. In this review, we investigated the most widely used software for the fundamental analysis and QC of cancer genome sequencing data and provided instructions for selecting the most appropriate software and pipelines to ensure precise and efficient conclusions. We further discussed the prospects and new research directions for cancer genomics.
86
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Heng Li, Alec Wysoker, Tim Fennell et al. · Bioinformatics · 2009 · 67.5K citations · Full text
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
Ben Langmead, Steven L. Salzberg · Nature Methods · 2012 · 61.1K citations
Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads
Marcel Martin · EMBnet journal · 2011 · 35.8K citations · Full text
fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor
Shifu Chen, Yanqing Zhou, Yaru Chen et al. · Bioinformatics · 2018 · 29.7K citations · Full text