Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · 2018 · 30 citations · 43 references
Language StudiesVision ScienceEye MovementsPsycholinguisticsVisual AttentionAttention In ReadingLexical AccessReadingReading ProcessesSentence ProcessingWord Frequency EffectsEye Tracking In ReadingLow-frequency WordsParafoveal Preview BenefitParafoveal ProcessingPreview BenefitsSaccadic Eye Movement ControlSentence Processing In ReadingSerial Processing In Reading
Using gaze-contingent display changes in the boundary paradigm during sentence reading, it has recently been shown that parafoveal word-processing difficulties affect fixations on words to the right of the boundary. Current interpretations of this post-boundary preview difficulty effect range from delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects in parallel word-processing models to forced fixations in serial word-processing models. However, these findings are based on an experimental design that, while allowing to isolate preview difficulty effects, might have established a bias with respect to asymmetries in parafoveal preview benefit for high-frequent and low-frequent target words. Here, we present a revision of this paradigm varying the preview's lexical frequency and keeping the target word constant. We found substantial effects of the preview difficulty in fixation durations after the boundary confirming that preview processing affects the oculomotor decisions not only via trans-saccadic integration of preview and target word information. An additional time-course analysis showed that the preview difficulty effect was significant across the full fixation duration distribution on the target word without any evidence on the pretarget word before the boundary. We discuss implications of the accumulating evidence of post-boundary preview difficulty effects for models of eye movement control during reading.
43
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team · 2000 · 353K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Computer Science, Statistical Computing +10
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using <b>lme4</b>
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker et al. · Journal of Statistical Software · 2015 · 85.6K citations · Full text