JAMA Oncology · 2018 · 345 citations · 17 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacotherapyImmunotherapyMolecular OncologyTumor ProgressionCancer ImmunotherapyCancer Survival AnalysisImmunotherapy For Skin CancerMelanoma PharmacotherapyTargeted Cancer TherapyTargeted TherapyBraf V600 MutationsBraf V600e MutationMelanoma ImmunotherapyMelanoma ProgressionMulticenter Trial ApprovalMulticenter Trial Data ManagementMulticenter TrialsSurvival Rates
Importance: This analysis provides long-term follow-up in patients with BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma receiving first-line therapy based on anti-programmed cell death 1 receptor inhibitors. Objective: To compare the 3-year survival with nivolumab vs that with dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This follow-up of a randomized phase 3 trial analyzed 3-year overall survival data from the randomized, controlled, double-blind CheckMate 066 phase 3 clinical trial. For this ongoing, multicenter academic institution trial, patients were enrolled from January 2013 through February 2014. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with confirmed unresectable previously untreated stage III or IV melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 but without a BRAF mutation. Interventions: Patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxic events with nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks). Main Outcome and Measure: Overall survival. Results: At minimum follow-ups of 38.4 months among 210 participants in the nivolumab group (median age, 64 years [range, 18-86 years]; 57.6% male) and 38.5 months among 208 participants in the dacarbazine group (median age, 66 years [range, 25-87 years]; 60.1% male), 3-year overall survival rates were 51.2% (95% CI, 44.1%-57.9%) and 21.6% (95% CI, 16.1%-27.6%), respectively. The median overall survival was 37.5 months (95% CI, 25.5 months-not reached) in the nivolumab group and 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.6-13.0 months) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59; P < .001). Complete and partial responses, respectively, were reported for 19.0% (40 of 210) and 23.8% (50 of 210) of patients in the nivolumab group compared with 1.4% (3 of 208) and 13.0% (27 of 208) of patients in the dacarbazine group. Additional analyses were performed on outcomes with subsequent therapies. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 15.0% (31 of 206) of nivolumab-treated patients and in 17.6% (36 of 205) of dacarbazine-treated patients. There were no deaths due to study drug toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance: Nivolumab led to improved 3-year overall survival vs dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01721772.
17
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki
JAMA · 2013 · 29.4K citations
Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma
James Larkin, Vanna Chiarion‐Sileni, René González et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 8.1K citations · Full text
Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
Caroline Robert, Jacob Schachter, Georgina V. Long et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 5.8K citations · Full text
Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
Jedd D. Wolchok, Vanna Chiarion‐Sileni, René González et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2017 · 5.4K citations · Full text
Pharmacy, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +17