Publication | Open Access
The contributions of Indigenous Peoples and local communities to ecological restoration
287
Citations
75
References
2018
Year
Ecological RestorationCommunity-based ConservationNative Environmental SovereigntyLand RestorationIndigenous PeoplesIndigenous PeopleEnvironmental PlanningSocial SciencesIndigenous GovernanceLanguage StudiesEcology (Ecological Sciences)Land RehabilitationIndigenous CulturesTraditional Ecological KnowledgeCultural PreservationIndigenous HeritageGeographyHabitat ConservationHabitat ReconstructionIplc Local TraditionsRestoration ActivitiesIndigenous IdentityIndigenous Knowledge SystemsLocal CommunitiesNatural RestorationAnthropologyLand Conservation
Indigenous Peoples and local communities depend on their environment for livelihoods, making ecosystem resilience essential for their well‑being, yet many restoration projects fail to deliver benefits. The authors argue that Indigenous Peoples and local communities should be a central focus in any post‑2020 CBD restoration agenda. The review draws on literature examples showing Indigenous Peoples and local communities engaging in restoration through traditional practices, land reclamation, and collaboration with external groups, and demonstrates how Indigenous and Local Knowledge can be integrated into planning, execution, and monitoring.
Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPLC) are affected by global environmental change because they directly rely on their immediate environment for meeting basic livelihood needs. Therefore, safeguarding and restoring ecosystem resilience is critical to support their well‐being. Based on examples from the literature, we illustrate how IPLC participate in restoration activities maintaining traditional practices, restoring land degraded by outsiders, and joining outside groups seeking to restore ecosystems. Our review also provides examples of how Indigenous and Local Knowledge can be incorporated in the planning, execution, and monitoring of restoration activities. However, not all restoration initiatives engaging IPLC are beneficial or successful, and the factors that lead to success are not fully known. While local involvement in restoration projects is often mentioned as an element of success, this is primarily associated to projects that actively involve IPLC in codesigning restoration activities affecting their territories, ensure both short‐term direct benefits to IPLC and long‐term support of the maintenance of restored areas, and recognize IPLC local traditions and customary institutions. Based on these examples, we argue that IPLC should be a more important focus in any post‐2020 CBD agenda on restoration.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1