What Drives Differences in Management Practices?

Nicholas Bloom, Erik Brynjolfsson, Lucia Foster, Ron S. Jarmin, Megha Patnaik, Itay Saporta‐Eksten, John Van Reenen

American Economic Review · 2019 · 445 citations · 44 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study surveys structured management practices across 35,000 manufacturing plants in 2010 and 2015 via a new Census Bureau–partnered instrument. The survey reveals wide dispersion of management practices, with 40 % of variation within firms, and shows that such practices explain over 20 % of productivity variation, driven by right‑to‑work laws and spillovers from large plants. JEL codes: D22, D24, L25, L60, M11, M50.

Abstract

Partnering with the US Census Bureau, we implement a new survey of “structured” management practices in two waves of 35,000 manufacturing plants in 2010 and 2015. We find an enormous dispersion of management practices across plants, with 40 percent of this variation across plants within the same firm. Management practices account for more than 20 percent of the variation in productivity, a similar, or greater, percentage as that accounted for by R&D, ICT, or human capital. We find evidence of two key drivers to improve management. The business environment, as measured by right-to-work laws, boosts incentive management practices. Learning spillovers, as measured by the arrival of large “Million Dollar Plants” in the county, increases the management scores of incumbents. (JEL D22, D24, L25, L60, M11, M50)

References

44