Publication | Open Access
Translating the ICAP Theory of Cognitive Engagement Into Practice
331
Citations
71
References
2018
Year
ICAP is a theory of active learning that distinguishes student engagement by behavior, asserting that Interactive (co‑generative collaboration) and Constructive (generative) engagement outperform Active and Passive engagement. The paper reports a 5‑year project that aimed to translate ICAP into a theory of instruction and discusses teachers’ difficulties in designing and eliciting Interactive engagement. The study employed five successive measures: teachers’ ICAP understanding after an online module, their success designing lesson plans with different ICAP modes, fidelity of classroom implementation, students’ enacted behavior modes, and students’ learning outcomes. Although teachers had minimal success in designing Constructive and Interactive activities, students nevertheless learned significantly more in the context of Constructive than Active activities.
Abstract ICAP is a theory of active learning that differentiates students’ engagement based on their behaviors. ICAP postulates that I nteractive engagement, demonstrated by co‐generative collaborative behaviors, is superior for learning to C onstructive engagement, indicated by generative behaviors. Both kinds of engagement exceed the benefits of A ctive or P assive engagement, marked by manipulative and attentive behaviors, respectively. This paper discusses a 5‐year project that attempted to translate ICAP into a theory of instruction using five successive measures: (a) teachers’ understanding of ICAP after completing an online module, (b) their success at designing lesson plans using different ICAP modes, (c) fidelity of teachers’ classroom implementation, (d) modes of students’ enacted behaviors, and (e) students’ learning outcomes. Although teachers had minimal success in designing Constructive and Interactive activities, students nevertheless learned significantly more in the context of Constructive than Active activities. We discuss reasons for teachers’ overall difficulty in designing and eliciting Interactive engagement.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1