An Integrated, Developmental Four-Year Medical School Curriculum in Palliative Care: A Longitudinal Content Evaluation Based on National Competency Standards

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While palliative care (PC) competencies for medical school graduates have been defined, the lack of established curriculum models and assessment tools hampers curricular evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To describe the scope and content of the University of Rochester's longitudinal, integrated four-year PC curriculum after 17 years of implementation, review student evaluative responses, and compare the curriculum to national competency standards. DESIGN AND SETTING: Combining and reorganizing a published PC curriculum assessment tool and a list of medical school PC competencies, we created a novel nine-topic framework to assess the content coverage of our curriculum. We queried our electronic medical school curriculum database and surveyed course and clerkship directors, as well as PC, pain, ethics, and humanities faculty, to locate where and when PC topics are taught and to collate student responses to these experiences. RESULTS: We present a comprehensive list of PC curricular activities over a four-year medical school experience. The curriculum covers all nine PC topics longitudinally in multiple formats. Five in-depth activities cover multiple PC topics in a format that integrates biological, psychological, and social dimensions; these activities have survived and evolved over 17 years in our setting. A majority of year 3 University of Rochester students feel "well" or "extremely well" trained in PC. CONCLUSIONS: Our four-year PC curriculum provides robust and developmentally appropriate training that addresses all nine evidence-based core topics for PC education. Medical student feedback and their Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) survey responses suggest that they find their PC learning experiences rewarding. This curriculum could serve as a model for other schools.