Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants · 2017 · 32 citations · 38 references
Life SciencesBotanyPlant SciencesCrop ProtectionInsect PhysiologyInsect ToxicologyChemical Defense In PlantsEssential Oil PlantsHerbivore-induced Plant VolatilesInsect-plant InteractionsPlant-insect Chemical InteractionsToxic PlantsEssential Oil AnalysisEssential Oil ExtractionEssential Oil ProfilingEssential Oil ToxicityExtraction Of Essential OilsInsecticides From Botanical Extracts
Sitophilus oryzae (L) were subjected to essential oils extracted from Mentha piperita L, Rosmarinus officinalis L and Hyssopus officinalis L. Chemical structure, repellency, fumigant toxicity and feeding reduction of the essential oils were investigated. Chemical composition of the essential oils of M. piperita, R. officinalis and H. officinalis were identified by GC-MS. Menthol (43.95%), menthone (8.28%) and 1,8-cineole (7.07%) were major components of M. piperita oil; α-pinene (23.52%), verbenone (11.87%) and 1,8-cineole (8.56%) were the main components of R. officinalis oil and cis-pinocamphone (23.39%), trans-pinocamphone (17.78%) and β-pinene (9.64%) were major components of H. officinalis oil. In fumigants bioassay, H. officinalis (78.16 μl/L) had the highest toxicity against S. oryzae adults, followed by R. officinalis (115.63 μl/L) and M. piperita (299.51 μl/L), respectively. Also, the S. oryzae was repelled by M. piperita (95.0%), R. officinalis (91.0%) and H. officinalis (86.5%), respectively. Based on measured nutritional indices of adults, the highest FDI and the lowest RGR, RCR, and ECI were obtained when adults were treated with M. piperita and H. officinalis at 10 μL/g food. In conclusion, H. officinalis essential oil was more potent for use in organic food protection.
38
Plant essential oils for pest and disease management
Murray B. Isman · Crop Protection · 2000 · 2.4K citations