Publication | Closed Access
Informing System Design Using Human Performance Modeling
26
Citations
26
References
2017
Year
EngineeringTask AnalysisSystem-level DesignSystems DesignInterface DesignHuman Performance ModelingBusiness ModelsSystem Of Systems EngineeringModel-based Systems EngineeringSystems EngineeringModeling And SimulationHuman FactorsPerformance EngineeringSystems AnalysisAbstract HumansMachine SystemsModel‐based Systems EngineeringDesign EvaluationDesignUser ExperienceDiagnostic ExcellenceHuman Systems IntegrationSoftware DesignHuman Factors EngineeringModel-based System EngineeringHuman Machine SystemAutomationProcess Modelling
Human factors are critical in systems engineering, and incorporating human performance models can significantly influence design decisions such as task allocation, workflow, and interface, offering opportunities beyond traditional physics‑based MBSE approaches. The study proposes an approach for integrating system models with human performance modeling to enable earlier and more effective system design. The authors use a quantitative case study, beginning with SysML diagrams and task analysis to build an as‑is human performance model in IMPRINT, then create alternative models with varied design parameters to conduct a trade study. The analysis verifies human constraints and assumptions and estimates the impact of varying automation levels.
ABSTRACT Humans play a key role in the operation and support of most systems and model‐based systems engineering (MBSE) offers new opportunities to properly consider human capabilities and involvement. This research presents an approach for systems engineers to integrate system models with human performance modeling for early and more effective system design. Unlike analyses using traditional physics‐based models found in most extant MBSE literature, adjusting system parameters for human‐based analyses can greatly impact the design of the system itself. Adjusting a human‐system parameter can lead to design implications including adjustments to task allocation, process and workflow, and interface design. To demonstrate this, a quantitative case‐study approach is used. Starting with a set of Systems Modeling Language (SysML) diagrams, a task analysis is performed to inform an “as is” model of human performance in the Improved Performance Research Integration Tool (IMPRINT). An alternative IMPRINT model is created with varying design parameters and utilized to perform a trade study. Through the analysis, constraints and assumptions placed on the human are verified and the results of varying automation estimated. With current design emphasis in MBSE and model‐based engineering (MBE), there is great opportunity to emphasize human considerations and integrate human performance analysis.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1