Bridging Design and Behavioral Research With Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling

Jörg Henseler

Journal of Advertising · 2017 · 998 citations · 82 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Advertising research studies marketing artifacts and consumer behavior, requiring methods that can model both design and behavioral constructs with distinct measurement models. This article introduces variance‑based structural equation modeling as a family of techniques capable of handling composites, common factors, and causal‑formative measurement models. It proposes confirmatory composite analysis, CFA with HTMT, and the MIMIC model to assess the nomological, construct, and external validity of composites, common factors, and causal‑formative constructs, respectively.

Abstract

Advertising research is a scientific discipline that studies artifacts (e.g., various forms of marketing communication) as well as natural phenomena (e.g., consumer behavior). Empirical advertising research therefore requires methods that can model design constructs as well as behavioral constructs, which typically require different measurement models. This article presents variance-based structural equation modeling (SEM) as a family of techniques that can handle different types of measurement models: composites, common factors, and causal–formative measurement. It explains the differences between these types of measurement models and clears up possible ambiguity regarding formative endogenous constructs. The article proposes confirmatory composite analysis to assess the nomological validity of composites, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT) to assess the construct validity of common factors, and the multiple indicator, multiple causes (MIMIC) model to assess the external validity of causal–formative measurement.

References

82