Loose and Tight GNSS/INS Integrations: Comparison of Performance Assessed in Real Urban Scenarios

Gianluca Falco, Marco Pini, Gianluca Marucco

Sensors · 2017 · 237 citations · 17 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

GNSS remains the primary positioning method, yet its accuracy degrades in many environments, and while tight‑coupled GNSS/INS systems offer benefits, they are usually limited to high‑grade IMUs. This study evaluates the performance gains of a tightly‑coupled GNSS/INS integration that employs low‑cost sensors and a mass‑market GNSS receiver. The authors develop concise tight‑coupling algorithms, then test them in real urban scenarios and compare the results against commercial modules operating in standalone or loosely‑coupled modes. The experiments demonstrate that the low‑cost tight‑coupled system achieves practical performance improvements over standalone and loosely‑coupled alternatives in urban environments.

Abstract

Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) remain the principal mean of positioning in many applications and systems, but in several types of environment, the performance of standalone receivers is degraded. Although many works show the benefits of the integration between GNSS and Inertial Navigation Systems (INSs), tightly-coupled architectures are mainly implemented in professional devices and are based on high-grade Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs). This paper investigates the performance improvements enabled by the tight integration, using low-cost sensors and a mass-market GNSS receiver. Performance is assessed through a series of tests carried out in real urban scenarios and is compared against commercial modules, operating in standalone mode or featuring loosely-coupled integrations. The paper describes the developed tight-integration algorithms with a terse mathematical model and assesses their efficacy from a practical perspective.

References

17