eLife · 2016 · 319 citations · 63 references
Life SciencesBiologyEvolutionary BiologyExperimental EvolutionMolecular EvolutionStructural BiologyAdaptive LandscapesEpistasisFitness Landscape AnalysisFitness LandscapesMolecular AdaptationProtein EvolutionAdaptive EvolutionAdaptive Protein EvolutionEpistasis In Protein EvolutionEpistatic Fitness LandscapeProtein Fitness LandscapesProtein Sequence EvolutionReciprocal Sign EpistasisRugged Fitness Landscapes
The structure of fitness landscapes is critical for understanding adaptive protein evolution. Previous empirical studies on fitness landscapes were confined to either the neighborhood around the wild type sequence, involving mostly single and double mutants, or a combinatorially complete subgraph involving only two amino acids at each site. In reality, the dimensionality of protein sequence space is higher (20(L)) and there may be higher-order interactions among more than two sites. Here we experimentally characterized the fitness landscape of four sites in protein GB1, containing 20(4) = 160,000 variants. We found that while reciprocal sign epistasis blocked many direct paths of adaptation, such evolutionary traps could be circumvented by indirect paths through genotype space involving gain and subsequent loss of mutations. These indirect paths alleviate the constraint on adaptive protein evolution, suggesting that the heretofore neglected dimensions of sequence space may change our views on how proteins evolve.
63
WebLogo: A Sequence Logo Generator: Figure 1
Gavin E. Crooks, Gary C. Hon, John‐Marc Chandonia et al. · Genome Research · 2004 · 13K citations · Full text
Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins
Daniel Weinreich, Nigel F. Delaney, Mark A. DePristo et al. · Science · 2006 · 1.5K citations
Natural Selection and the Concept of a Protein Space
John Maynard Smith · Nature · 1970 · 971 citations