Georgetown journal of international affairs · 2016 · 30 citations · 4 references
EducationEducational AssessmentEducational MeasurementComparative Education PolicyEducational Policy ComparisonSocial InequalityAssessment EquityEducational EquityEquality Of Educational OpportunityNational Assessment SystemsQuality Of EducationAssessment Equity AnalysisComparative International AssessmentEducational Attainment InequalityEquity In AchievementInternational BenchmarkingInternational Comparative AssessmentPerformance-based Assessment In MathematicsSocioeconomic Inequality In Education
This paper uses PISA data to explore cross-national comparisons of mathematics performance and educational inequality, with a focus on those countries that are characterized by high PISA scores and greater equity. The authors discuss the dangers of giving too much attention to a single year’s high performer on a given international assessment. Instead, they argue that the PISA and TIMSS should be analyzed with a more nuanced set of indicators and with greater sensitivity to long-term trends. This approach can help generate new research hypotheses, identify groups of countries worthy of detailed study, and yield fresh insights on educational policy.
4