Publication | Open Access
Yield and Quality of Tomato Fruit under Water-table Management
16
Citations
0
References
1997
Year
EngineeringBotanyDroughtNew YorkerDrought StressSustainable AgricultureAgricultural EconomicsCrop Water RelationHorticultural ScienceWater Table DepthTomato FruitCrop PhysiologyFood QualityPlant PhysiologyVegetable ProductionCrop Quality
In a 2-year study (1993-94), tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `New Yorker') plants grown in a sandy loam soil in field lysimeters were subjected to four water table depth (WTD) treatments (0.3, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 m from the soil surface). In 1994, precipitation during the flowering stage was far above average and apparently led to waterlogging in the shallowest WTD treatment, while in the drier year (1993), the deepest WTD treatment suffered from drought stress. In general, over the 2 years, the 0.6-m WTD showed the best yields and largest fruit, while the 1.0-m WTD showed the lowest yields and smallest fruit. However, the incidence of catfacing, cracking, and sunscald was generally higher in the 0.6 m WTD treatment and lower in the 1.0-m WTD treatment. Furthermore, fruit firmness was generally greatest for the two deeper WTD than for the shallower WTD. To strike a balance between yield and quality, a WTD of between 0.6- and 0.8-m is recommended for tomato production on sandy loam soils.