Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · 2016 · 73 citations · 46 references
EducationHigher EducationTeachingLanguage PedagogyPedagogyWriting InstructionAcademic WritingCritical PedagogyPeer Review
The study examines why Wikipedia is both resisted and increasingly accepted in higher education, outlining its perceived benefits for teaching. The authors identify misconceptions, quality doubts, concerns about peer‑review disruption, and a lack of career incentives as barriers to Wikipedia adoption. The paper argues that incorporating Wikipedia into coursework can foster students’ critical thinking and academic writing abilities.
This article explores the current perception of W ikipedia in academia, focusing on both the reasons for its unpopularity among some and the reasons for its growing acceptance among others. First, the reasons that W ikipedia is still struggling to gain acceptance among many academics and higher education professionals are identified. These include common misconceptions about W ikipedia, doubts about its quality, uneasiness with the challenge that it poses to the traditional peer‐review system, and a lack of career‐enhancing motivations related to using W ikipedia. Second, the benefits of teaching with W ikipedia for educators, students, and the wider society, as discussed in the current teaching literature, are explored. Finally, the article presents an argument for using Wikipedia in a variety of ways to help students develop critical and academic writing skills.
46