Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and a multilingual pedagogical approach

Åsta Haukås

International Journal of Multilingualism · 2015 · 381 citations · 17 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Teachers’ beliefs are key to understanding classroom decision‑making. This study investigates Norwegian teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and a multilingual pedagogical approach in third‑language classrooms. The authors conducted focus‑group discussions with 12 Norwegian teachers of French, German, and Spanish and analysed the data using qualitative content analysis. Three themes emerged: teachers view multilingualism as potentially positive yet not automatically beneficial; they frequently draw on students’ Norwegian and English knowledge but rarely emphasize strategy transfer; and they believe cross‑language collaboration could enhance learning, though it is currently absent.

Abstract

Knowledge of teachers’ beliefs is central to understanding teachers’ decision-making in the classroom. The present study explores Norwegian language teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and the use of a multilingual pedagogical approach in the third-language (L3) classroom. This study analysed data collected via focus group discussions with 12 teachers of French (N = 4), German (N = 2) and Spanish (N = 6) using qualitative content analysis. Three main themes emerged from the analysis. (1) The teachers view multilingualism as a potentially positive asset. Although they think that multilingualism has benefited their own language learning, they do not conclude that multilingualism is automatically an asset to students. (2) The teachers claim to make frequent use of their students’ linguistic knowledge of Norwegian and English when teaching the L3. However, the teachers rarely focus on the transfer of learning strategies because they believe that learning an L3 is completely different from learning the second language L2 English. (3) The teachers think that collaboration across languages could enhance students’ language learning; however, no such collaboration currently exists.

References

17