Will they stay or will they go? The role of job embeddedness in predicting turnover in individualistic and collectivistic cultures.

Anuradha Ramesh, Michele J. Gelfand

Journal of Applied Psychology · 2010 · 316 citations · 90 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Turnover is a global concern, yet few cross‑cultural studies have examined it. The study tested whether the job embeddedness model generalizes across the United States and India. Using data from 797 call‑center employees in both countries, the authors evaluated the job embeddedness model and introduced a family‑embeddedness construct. In the U.S., person‑job fit lowered turnover, whereas in India, person‑organization fit, organization links, and community links did; family‑embeddedness also predicted lower turnover in both contexts.

Abstract

Although turnover is an issue of global concern, paradoxically there have been few studies of turnover across cultures. We investigated the cross-cultural generalizability of the job embeddedness model (Mitchell & Lee, 2001) by examining turnover in an individualistic country (United States) and a collectivistic country (India). Using cross-cultural data from call centers (N = 797), we demonstrated that although organization job embeddedness predicted turnover in both countries, different dimensions of job embeddedness predicted turnover in the United States and India. As hypothesized, on the basis of individualism-collectivism theory, person-job fit was a significant predictor of lower turnover in the United States, whereas person-organization fit, organization links, and community links were significant predictors of lower turnover in India. We also explored whether a newly developed construct of embeddedness-family embeddedness-predicts turnover above and beyond job embeddedness and found initial support for its utility in both the United States and India. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

References

90