Educational Researcher · 2002 · 425 citations · 12 references
EducationEducational AssessmentEducational MeasurementAssessment PolicyStandardized TestingState Education PolicyAchievement StandardsAchievement TestingNational Assessment SystemsPerformance StandardsPublic EducationState StandardsAccountability Systems In EducationAssessmentsNational Assessment FrameworksSchool Accountability SystemsSocioeconomic BackgroundState Education StandardsState Educational StandardsStatewide Assessment Systems
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 expanded testing and accountability, requiring all schools to meet adequate yearly progress for every student subgroup, yet state standards and test rigor vary widely, leading to volatile year‑to‑year gains. The study proposes using biennial National Assessment of Educational Progress results to level the playing field across states. Proficiency rates on state assessments differ dramatically, with some states still far from the 100 % target, underscoring the difficulty of meeting AYP goals.
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 substantially increases the testing requirements for states and sets demanding accountability standards for schools, districts, and states with measurable adequate yearly progress (AYP) objectives for all students and subgroups of students defined by socioeconomic background, race–ethnicity, English language proficiency, and disability. However, states’ content standards, the rigor of their tests, and the stringency of their performance standards vary greatly. Consequently, the percentage of students who score at the proficient level or higher on the state assessments varies radically from state to state. Some states have farther to go than others to meet the mandated target of 100% proficient within 12 years. These differences are illustrated and the implications for achieving AYP targets are discussed. Also addressed are possible uses of results from the biennial state-level administrations of the National Assessment of Educational Progress as a means of leveling the playing field. Factors contributing to the volatility of gains in achievement from year to year for individual schools are discussed.
12
How we should measure "change": Or should we?
Lee J. Cronbach, Lita Furby · Psychological Bulletin · 1970 · 2.5K citations
Education, Educational Assessment, Educational Measurement +12
Assessments and Accountability
Robert L. Linn · Educational Researcher · 2000 · 681 citations
Education, Educational Assessment, Educational Measurement +17