From Thought to Action: Effects of Process-Versus Outcome-Based Mental Simulations on Performance

Lien B. Pham, Shelley E. Taylor

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · 1999 · 632 citations · 31 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Mental simulations strengthen the connection between thinking and acting. The study compared process-focused versus outcome-focused mental simulations. Freshmen practiced process or outcome mental simulations for 5–7 days before a midterm, with a self‑monitoring control group. Process simulation increased study time, improved grades, and this benefit was mediated by better planning and lower anxiety.

Abstract

Mental simulations enhance the links between thought and action. The present research contrasted mental simulations that emphasize the process required to achieve a goal versus the outcome of goal achievement. For 5 to 7 days prior to a midterm examination, college freshmen mentally simulated either the process for doing well on the exam (good study habits) or simulated a desired outcome (getting a good grade) or both. A self-monitoring control condition was included. Results indicated that process simulation enhanced studying and improved grades; the latter effect was mediated by enhanced planning and reduced anxiety. Implications of process and outcome simulations for effective goal pursuit are discussed.

References

31