Image the Journal of Nursing Scholarship · 1998 · 330 citations · 36 references
ManagementNursing AdministrationOrganizational BehaviorBusiness EthicsEthical LeadershipMedical EthicsEthical AssessmentEthical ClimateHealthcare EthicsHospital EthicsOrganizational ClimateOrganizational EthicsConstruct ValidityEthical Climate AssessmentEthical Climate MeasurementEthical Climate PerceptionInternal Consistency ReliabilityPsychometric PropertiesPsychometric ValidityRegistered Nurses
Measuring ethical climate helps nurses understand workplace influences and diagnose areas for organizational change. The study aims to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a survey measuring nurses’ perceptions of ethical climate. A descriptive study sampled 360 registered nurses from two acute‑care hospitals, who completed the 43‑item Hospital Ethical Climate Survey and related scales, and the instrument’s construct validity was assessed via confirmatory factor analysis using LISREL®7. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded a 26‑item, five‑factor model with high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.91 overall, 0.68–0.92 for subscales), indicating acceptable initial reliability and validity.
Purpose: To develop an instrument to measure how hospital nurses perceive the ethical climate of their work setting and to evaluate its psychometric properties. A way to measure ethical climate can help nurses understand the work setting influences on their practice and can be used to diagnose areas for organizational change as well as to evaluate effectiveness of organizational interventions. Design: Descriptive. Instrument developed was the Hospital Ethical Climate Survey (HECS). Sampled were 360 RNs (48% response rate) employed in clinical practice at two acute‐care hospitals in one U.S. midwestern city. The nurses completed a questionnaire in 1993–1994 consisting of items developed to assess their perceptions of ethical climate, along with the 43‐item Integrity Audit, a social desirability scale, and a demographic inventory. Methods: Construct validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using the LISREL®7 statisticaI program. Results: The final CFA model consisted of 26 variables in five factors, which were organized according to the relationships of nurses with peers, patients, managers, hospital, and physicians. Internal consistency reliability, using Cronbach's alpha, for the final 26‐item instrument was 0.91 (range 0.68 to 0.92) for the subscales. Conclusions: The Hospital Ethical Climate Survey has acceptable initial reliability and validity.
36
Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity
Mary R. Lynn · Nursing Research · 1986 · 6.4K citations
Social Sciences, Educational Measurement, Method Validation +9
Benjamin Schneider · Personnel Psychology · 1987 · 4.5K citations