Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · 2003 · 121 citations · 37 references
ManagementPsychologyCognitive PsychologyCreativityPersonality PsychologyCreative CognitionCreative ProcessCreativity AssessmentIndividual CreativityCognitive Processes In CreativityConceptual Model DevelopmentCreativity TestsEducational Creativity Assessment
It is argued that the concept of creativity is too loosely defined, and too much driven from a bottom-up operationalist view. It is also argued that current popular definitions of creativity, by focusing on novelty and appropriateness, do not distinguish the concept of creativity in a satisfactory way from standard definitions of the concept of intelligence, which also focus on novelty and appropriateness as key defining features. A solution to this conceptual dilemma is offered by way of making a clear-cut distinction between novelty on the stimulus and novelty on the response side. This distinction is used as a platform for the development of a new taxonomy of different kinds of creativity and intelligent behaviour. A major feature of this new model is the distinction made between proactive and reactive creativity. Finally, the conceptual model is used as a basis for pointing out some shortcomings of existing tests of creativity and, with a practical-educational perspective in mind, some specific suggestions on the anatomy of a new kind of creativity assessment are made.
37
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Ikujiro Nonaka · Organization Science · 1994 · 17.5K citations
Daniel A. Levinthal, James G. March · Strategic Management Journal · 1993 · 7.2K citations
The Nature of Human Intelligence
John B. Carroll, J. P. Guilford · American Educational Research Journal · 1968 · 4.7K citations
The associative basis of the creative process.
Sarnoff A. Mednick · Psychological Review · 1962 · 4.1K citations
J. P. Guilford · American Psychologist · 1950 · 3.5K citations