The Review of Economics and Statistics · 2006 · 407 citations · 52 references
LawEmployment LawLabor LawEmployment PolicyLabor EconomicsWrongful TerminationAt-will Employment ExceptionsImplied Contract ClaimsTermination ProtectionWrongful Termination ClaimsDifference-in-differencesImplied Contract ExceptionImplied Contract FormationImplied Contract TheoryImplied-in-fact Contract DoctrineLitigation In State CourtsPublic Policy Wrongful DischargePublic Policy Wrongful Termination
We estimate the effects on employment and wages of wrongful-discharge protections adopted by U.S. state courts during the last three decades. We find robust evidence that one wrongful-discharge doctrine, the implied-contract exception, reduced state employment rates by 0.8% to 1.7%. The initial impact is largest for female and less-educated workers (those who change jobs frequently), while the longer-term effect is greater for older and more-educated workers (those most likely to litigate). By contrast, we find no robust employment or wage effects of two other widely recognized wrongful-discharge laws: the public-policy and goodfaith exceptions.
52
Journal of Economic Literature
Steven Durlauf · AEA Papers and Proceedings · 2019 · 7.5K citations · Full text
American Economic Review · 2009 · 2.2K citations