Journal of Refugee Studies · 2014 · 87 citations · 15 references
Social SciencesInternational RelationsPolitical ScienceGlobal GovernanceInternational OrganizationsTransnational GovernanceAsylum PolicyRefugee GovernanceRefugee PolicyRefugee ProtectionRefugee RightsRefugee StudiesCivil Society TheoryInternational Refugee RegimeNon-state Actor ParticipationRefugee PoliticsRefugee RegimesRefugee Rights AdvocacyRefugee TransnationalismTransnational Activist Networks
This article examines the role of two regional actors in the Asia–Pacific region, namely the Bali Process and the Asia Pacific Refugee Rights Network (APRRN), a platform of civil society organizations, as two very different models of mechanisms and agenda-setting on Global Refugee Policy (GRP). The Bali Process has limited actors and a narrow discourse on refugees which reflects a hierarchical agenda-setting process or ‘steering mode’. By contrast, the APRRN is a non-state network actor which works through non-hierarchical mechanisms as a transnational activist network (TAN) and has a normative agenda. This article demonstrates the tension within GRP which is being created within the region through these two intermediaries between the global North and the global South.
15
Forced Migration Studies: Could We Agree Just to 'Date'?
James C. Hathaway · Journal of Refugee Studies · 2007 · 190 citations · Full text